New Mexico Primary Care Association
Legal name: New Mexico Primary Medical Care
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850331657
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, US
- Phone
- (505) 880-8882
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,179,739
- Expenses
- $4,251,141
- Assets
- $7,654,937
- Liabilities
- $392,464
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- YVETTE RAMIREZ AMMERMAN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- YVETTE RAMIREZ AMMERMAN (CEO): $219,454 total reported compensation
- ROBERT LONGSTREET (COO/CIO): $216,035 total reported compensation
- JOHN DAILEY (CONTROLLER): $151,700 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support and strengthen New Mexico's community health centers in their mission to provide accessible, high-quality primary care to underserved populations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Non-grant services nmpca provides additional services to member and other organizations that are stand-alone fee for service arrangements. The health information technology program provides hosting and support for 501(c)3 primary care members who choose to share platforms and hosting facilities for their practice management systems and electronic health records to improve efficiency and quality of clinical services and operations. Eighteen organizations with approximately 100 clinical sites across New Mexico and California pool expertise and resources to achieve this integration with the funding assistance of a federal health center controlled network grant. Nmpca also provides direct it support to several of its members. Nmhccn services include design, planning, contracting, implementation and delivery of ehr systems and other applications from multiple vendors supporting different provider groups. Member organizations have local support for integrated health information technology (hit) solutions. Medical, behavioral health and dental treatment services are coordinated across platforms to support clinicians in providing patient centered care. The trainers and analytics staff support primary and preventive medical care, dental programs, substance use disorder treatment, pharmacy services and the many administrative compliance requirements of the members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 72% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.7%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.8; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 91.6% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $219K · 16 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $349K reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.