New Mexico High School Coaches Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850210859
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Phone
5055547349
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$516,982
Expenses
$401,622
Assets
$276,199
Liabilities
$46,737

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN SHOCK (PRESIDENT)
  • JEFF LYNN (PRESIDENT-EL)

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS BUSTER MABREY (EXECUTIVE DI): $36,667 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To help maintain the highest possible standards in athletics and in the coaching profession and to work together for the improvement of conditions in New Mexico high school athletics by: --fostering the knowledge of sports skills, the psychology of coaching, ethics of coaching, and sportsmanship by conducting coaching schools and by offering the training coaches need to become licensed; --fostering the study of physical education and encouraging the development of young coaches; --supporting activities that will help provide higher education opportunity for the youth of New Mexico; and --encouraging research and preparation of publications devoted to enhancing the skills of coaches in New Mexico.

What it reported doing in 2024

A.the nmhsca has positively impacted high school student-athletes and coaches across New Mexico by selecting and recognizing all-star athletes, all-state athletes, and award-winning coaches. Additionally, the nmhsca has enhanced the quality of high school coaching in New Mexico through various professional development programs. B.the nmhsca selected 440 all-star athletes who participated in all-star games for cross country, football, volleyball, boys- and girls' basketball, softball, and baseball. Over 740 all-state athletes were selected and published from 1,902 nominations. The nmhsca also recognized over 100 award-winning coaches at both the state and national levels. Furthermore, the nmhsca hosted three coaching clinics that provided training for more than 2,000 coaches. C.thousands of high school athletes and coaches benefited from the nmhsca's non-profitt initiatives. The nmhsca played a significant role in advocating for students and coaches by representing them on the nmaa commission, at nmaa board of directors meetings, and nationally at organizations such as nocad, nhsaca, nhsbca, nfhs, and others. D.these accomplishments align with the organization's mission to enhance the quality of interscholastic competition in New Mexico and to improve the interscholastic experience for students and coaches. E.the reported accomplishments are for the current year. Note that school years follow a different calendar than the nmhsca tax year; however, figures have been adjusted to ensure timely reporting for tax purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.7%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 46.1%; rating input score 46; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.3%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.7% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $352K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $37K · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 46/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.