New Mexico Hay Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933403017
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Roswell, NM, USA
Phone
5759109000
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies & Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$99,549
Expenses
$54,634
Assets
$127,194
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOEL KLIEN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOEL KLIEN (PRESIDENT)
  • RAVAE LEONARD (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The New Mexico hay association (nmha) is organized to promote education, research, and the advancement of agricultural practices related to hay production in New Mexico. Nmha provides educational opportunities and resources for hay producers, including an annual conference focused on current research, emerging agricultural technologies, and improved production practices. The association promotes and supports research and education in areas important to hay production, including pesticide use and management, disease prevention and control, fertilizer optimization, plant breeding, crop improvement, and new agricultural technologies. Through these activities, nmha seeks to increase agricultural knowledge, encourage sound and sustainable production practices, and improve the quality and efficiency of hay production throughout New Mexico.

What it reported doing in 2025

The New Mexico hay association (nmha} conducts activities designed to support and help educate hay producers in New Mexico. The association holds an annual conference aimed at promoting research funding in key areas such as pesticides, disease management in hay, fertilizer optimization, plant breeding, and new agricultural technologies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.1%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.33; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.