New Mexico Families Forward
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871654225
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5054401996
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,000
- Expenses
- $26,351
- Assets
- $2,962
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHANIE MAEZ (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHANIE MAEZ (PRESIDENT)
- PHIL LUCERO (TREASURER)
- BRAD ELKINS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Nmff is primarily engaged in educating and advocating for issues important to new mexicans such as healthcare reform, tax policy, economic justice, and strengthening democracy. Most of our work occurs during the New Mexico state legislative session when we engage in grassroots lobbying related to the above-mentioned issues. During election years, nmff may decreasae the time spent on the above activities and allocate no more than 40% of its expenditures on electroral activities, which include: making independent expenditures to support candiates for New Mexico offices and making direct donations to state and local candidates.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025 we conducted policy research on New Mexico's ethics and disclosure laws.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.7%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 62%; rating input score 62
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -31.8%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 170.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -59% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -91.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.7% of revenue deployed · 62% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.