New Mexico Cancer Center Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770591110
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2010, Form 990-T 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5058578460
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Grantmaking Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $525,824
- Expenses
- $489,875
- Assets
- $1,581,461
- Liabilities
- $15,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MITCH VIGIL (PRESIDENT)
- ADAM ROACH (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MITCH VIGIL (PRESIDENT)
- ADAM ROACH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- RICHARD STRUNK (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The nmccf is dedicated to providing support to adult patients for their nonmedical financial needs such as rent, mortgage payments, utilities and transportation during the mangement of their disease. The nmccf also provides educational and other support to patients, their families and caregivers to meet their emotional and psychological needs during cancer treatment. Ongoing continuing medical education programs are developed to provide updated information on clinical practice and quality patient-focused care, thereby fostering excellence with clinicians and other health professionals.
What it reported doing in 2025
Lung cancer screening & outreach program: the nmccf is advancing innovative solutions to remove access barriers prevalent in New Mexico by focusing on lung cancer screening and access to care for any lung diseased diagnosis with an emphasis on native american communities in 2025 with its outreach arm of the program. The foundation initiated a 1-year partnership with a native american community outreach specialist to develop relationships with tribal communities to address health inequities by removing barriers within those communities created by geography, economics, provider relationship, and limited trust established by centuries of cultural marginalization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 57% for direct work, and 43% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.8%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.23; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.8% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $415K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.