New Life Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364710533
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Derwood, MD, USA
Phone
2402778728
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Music
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$39,894
Expenses
$46,708
Assets
$43,557
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michelle Cho (President)
  • Steve Tae (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Michelle Cho (President)
  • Hyewon Yoon (Director)
  • Jenny Wang (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

New Life Foundation is organized, and shall be operated exclusively, for charitable and educational purposes (as such terms are defined in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or the corresponding section of any future federal tax code (the "Code")), including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The purposes for which the corporation is formed are as follows: (i) providing music instruction to underprivileged children with musical talent; (ii) providing young, classically trained musicians with opportunities to express their talents by performing Christian orchestral music; and (iii) enabling students to share their love of music by performing in orphanages and other public venues both in their local communities and abroad.

What it reported doing in 2025

Sponsor tuition support and meal support for underprivileged kids

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.8%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 52.8%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.1%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.8% of revenue deployed · 52.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.