New Jersey State Fmba Long Branch Local #68

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223382563
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Long Branch, NJ, USA
Phone
7322220076
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$72,900
Expenses
$84,408
Assets
$130,151
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAWRENCE FORNICOLA (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER FAZIO (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LAWRENCE FORNICOLA (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER FAZIO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOSEPH GRAY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization was formed for the betterment and advancement of the interests of the paid firefighters of the city of long branch, New Jersey; to collectively bargain for, and promote the best interests of its members, and to collect and compile information and statictics, and to cultivate and perpetuate a fraternal friendship and camaraderie among the paid firefighters of the city of long branch, new jeresey.

What it reported doing in 2024

For the betterment and advancement of the interests of the paid firefighters of the city of long branch, New Jersey; to collectively bargain for, and promote the best interests of its members, and to collect and compile information and statictics, and to cultivate and perpetuate a fraternal friendship and camaraderie among the paid firefighters of the city of long branch, new jeresey.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.7%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.8%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.7% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.