New Jersey State Firemens Mutual Benevolent Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 412157749
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Hamilton, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6093921710
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,200
- Expenses
- $63,772
- Assets
- $8,808
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHANE MULL (PRESIDENT)
- STEVE DIXON (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRANDON CORIA (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHANE MULL (PRESIDENT)
- STEVE DIXON (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRANDON CORIA (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose for which this association shall be formed is to provide greater awareness and education to the general public in connection with the area of emergency services including, but not limited to, encouraging greater public understanding of fire safety and instruct the youth of the community in fire safety and prevention.to unite fraternally and to give all moral support in its power to the members composing it. To protect and defend, as deemed advisable, the rights, benefits and privileges to which any member now or hereafter may become entitled.
What it reported doing in 2024
For the betterment and advancement of the professional fire officers of hamilton township and to promote the best interests of its members & for fraternal member pursuits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 9
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.2%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 45% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.2% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.