New Jersey State Firemens Association Clifton Firemens Relief Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237081562
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Hawthorne, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2012328531
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $640,822
- Expenses
- $564,292
- Assets
- $2,270,291
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CRAIG HOPKINS (Vice President)
- PAUL LEBITSCH (President)
Highest reported compensation
- ARTHUR E VEALE III (Treasurer): $11,001 total reported compensation
- CHARLES P STAUHS (Secretary): $8,000 total reported compensation
- GEORGE SPIES (Trustee): $3,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide assistance to needy firefighters and/or their widows
What it reported doing in 2025
To provide assistace to needy firefighters and/or their widows
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 15
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.4%; rating input score 16
- Program expense ratio: 18.6%; rating input score 19
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 16.4% of revenue deployed · 18.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $105K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $11K · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.