New Jersey Psychiatric Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 210736620
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Neptune, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9085883540
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $459,552
- Expenses
- $438,102
- Assets
- $309,246
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIAN ISAACSON MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT (AS OF 5/25))
- LAUREN KAPLAN-SAGAL MD (PRESIDENT(AS OF 5/25))
- SONALI MAHAJAN MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- PATRICIA DECOTIIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- PATRICIA DECOTIIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $138,502 total reported compensation
- CONSUELO CAGANDE MD (OUTGOING APA ASSEMBLY REPRESENTATIVE): $7,500 total reported compensation
- BRIAN ISAACSON MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT (AS OF 5/25)): $2,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the New Jersey psychiatric association is to serve its members' professional practice needs, including delivering essential practice management tools and continuing education programs; fostering physician wellness as the foundation of successful practice; educating the public and New Jersey's lawmakers on the science of psychiatry; supporting the development of nj psychiatrists in training; promoting the professional standards of psychiatric care; and advocating to protect the interests of patients and their families.
What it reported doing in 2025
To foster the science, art and progress of psychiatry, in cooperation with and as a constituent part of the american psychiatric association; to serve as an influence toward the maintenance of high professional and administrative standards thereto related; to represent psychiatry in New Jersey; to assist the american psychiatry association in promoting its aims and objectives.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 34%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $139K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.