New Jersey Human Resource Planning Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521752454
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Lincroft, NJ, USA
Phone
9082761319
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,942
Expenses
$35,725
Assets
$8,090

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tracy Flack-Tyler (Co PRESIDENT)
  • Laurie Murphy (Co PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • Tracy Flack-Tyler (Co PRESIDENT)
  • Laurie Murphy (Co PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The New Jersey Human resource Planning Group's purpose is to conduct educational seminars for members covering topical issues in the field of Human Resource Planning & Development, and to provide opportunities for member contacts and discussions on Human Resource Planning subjects of common interest.

What it reported doing in 2015

The New Jersey Human resource Planning Group conducted educational seminars for members covering topical issues in the field of Human Resource Planning & Development. It also provided opportunities for member contacts and discussions on Human Resource Planning subjects of common interest through meetings and a membership directory.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -110.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.5% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.