New Jersey Highlands Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680636424
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Boonton, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9735887190
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $754,616
- Expenses
- $677,138
- Assets
- $608,507
- Liabilities
- $127,876
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID BUDD (PRESIDENT)
- MARK LOHBAUER (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOHN DONAHUE (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAVID BUDD (PRESIDENT)
- MARK LOHBAUER (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOHN DONAHUE (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To protect, preserve and enhance the water, forests wildlife, farmland and other natural, historic and cultural resources of the New Jersey highlands and to enhance the sustainability of natural and human communities and the quality of life for current and future generations.
What it reported doing in 2024
The New Jersey highlands coalition is the only nonprofit dedicated solely to protecting the aquifers, waters, forests, habitats, farmlands, wildlife, cultural resources, and recreational opportunities of the New Jersey highlands. Our programs are multifaceted and statewide in scope. Through our trenton initiative, we influence state policies and regulations affecting highlands resources, while collaborating with partners such as the pinelands preservation alliance, anjec, nj league of conservation voters, raritan headwaters association, musconetcong watershed association, great swamp watershed association, nj conservation foundation, passaic river coalition, sourlands conservancy, and hackensack riverkeeper. Together, we expand education and outreach through forestry and vernal pool projects, our policy and natural heritage committees, and grassroots support for more than 100 member and partner organizations.we continue to advocate for strong regional master plan conformance, oppose harmful projects, and provide comments on rules and proposals impacting the region. Internally, our board and staff are strengthening diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (deij) through dedicated committees, training, and cultural change, while externally fostering more inclusive partnerships. In collaboration with the ramapough lenape turtle clan, nyu langone health, and other partners, we advance environmental justice through initiatives such as the turtle clan health study, federal recognition, and permanent relocation from a superfund site.the coalition also funds cultural and environmental projects through our small grants program, supports highlands advocates, fosters a robust coalition of individual and organizational members, and increases awareness of highlands resources and clean water through educational webinars, our annual conference, car treks, a golf outing, art shows, and our over the edge event-all of which also raise funds to support our programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.8%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 71.1%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.8% of revenue deployed · 71.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $482K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.