New Jersey Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics (NJAAP)
Legal name: New Jersey Chapter American Academy of Pediatrics Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223699313
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Plainsboro, NJ, US
- Phone
- 609-842-0014
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Pediatrics Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,214,298
- Expenses
- $4,130,219
- Assets
- $2,605,773
- Liabilities
- $1,096,976
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- INDIRA AMATO (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- KATHARINE CLOUSER (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER CHUANG (VICE PRESIDENT - ELECT)
- PUTHENMADAM RADHAKRISHBNAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- FELICIA K TAYLOR (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- FELICIA K TAYLOR (CEO): $190,920 total reported compensation
- BEREND MULDER (CMO): $119,243 total reported compensation
- HARRIET LAZARUS (COO): $84,604 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the health, safety, and well-being of children and adolescents in New Jersey.
What it reported doing in 2024
Tpec: nj seedlings (supporting everyone in early development) transforms how pediatric primary care is delivered for prenatal-to-five-year-old (p-5) populations eligible for nj family care or who are uninsured. This initiative brings together experts in pediatrics, parents, and healthysteps (hs) practice leaders to improve early childhood development (ecd) along with social-emotional health, school readiness, family well-being, and health equity outcomes. The aim is to: a) improve equitable access to a continuum of ecd services in pediatric patient-centered medical homes, and b) improve the capacity of pediatric practices and the workforce to deliver high-quality ecd services that address the holistic needs of children and families. The program is currently implemented at three practice sites in New Jersey. Healthysteps specialists (ecd experts) are trained to connect families to services including early developmental health promotion/prevention, screening and surveillance, care coordination and linkage, and interventions. Each practice has or is in the process of engaging a parent expert with lived experience who serves as a family resources specialist who leverages lived experience to provide peer-to-peer support for parents and ensures that family voice and perspectives are included in decision-making and routines at the practice and systems level to ensure parent-to-parent support. Training is provided via technical assistance, implementation resources, and a 6-month maintenance of certification (moc) part 4 quality improvement (qi) project echo to strengthen ecd integration, share successes and challenges, and support one another in their journey. A qi coach supports practices to support small tests of change, implementation of improvements, and provides strategies for the spread and sustainability of practice transformation. The program leverages the infrastructure and expertise of key stakeholders in the early childhood space in nj and ensures a unified, integrated, and coordinated approach that uplifts a variety of family voices throughout nj. It accomplishes this through the establishment of a steering committee, patient & family advisory council at each practice site, and a quarterly learning community. Additionally, an early relational health coalition helps to advance solutions to identify specific barriers to sustained and holistic ecd service delivery in primary care, discussing topics such as policy and financing barriers, ecd workforce needs, care coordination, and service gaps to ensure the best ecd outcomes for infants and young children in nj. Effective and ongoing evaluation of the model design and implementation is also conducted, with data analysis focused on multiple data sets, including qualitative and quantitative data from pediatric practice teams, implementation process measures, and patient and family data. The center for community health and evaluation collects, aggregates, and analyzes data from practices regarding knowledge change, evaluation of learning, and ease of implementation of the hs screening process.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 61% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $604.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 82.6%; rating input score 83; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 88.8% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $191K · 26 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.