New Jersey Association On Correction

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
221729877
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Trenton, NJ, USA
Phone
6093968900
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,325,793
Expenses
$12,197,178
Assets
$7,611,064
Liabilities
$3,701,009

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANGEL PEREZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DIANNE SCOTT-BEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CALVIN JOHN SMILEY PHD (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANGEL PEREZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $175,050 total reported compensation
  • DIANE HOBBS (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $139,704 total reported compensation
  • QUARTICHA PERKINS (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $116,733 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's exempt purpose is to promote social justice and human dignity in the policies and institutions which govern offenders and victims of crime through educational, legislative, and rehabilitative programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Njac maintains several housing programs such as jennie's place, comprehensive eviction defense and diversion (cedd) and camden scattered sites. Jennie's place is located in newark, nj. And provides permanent housing for women who have exited the criminal justice system, are homeless, and have a disability. Women in the program receive case management and supportive services. The cedd program helps to keep renters stably housed by providing tenants with no-cost housing support services, case management and financial support. Under the cedd program, tenants will have access to caseworkers, known as resource navigators, who are trained in addressing housing insecurity and preventing housing displacement. Caseworkers, who will have experience in crisis intervention techniques, will assist tenants by providing relocation and rapid rehousing support, social services support, and rental assistance resources support. Additionally, tenants will be able to access financial support from the cedd program to cover expenses related to eviction-related emergencies, including help with past due rent, security deposits, relocation expenses, and legal services. Camden county scattered sites program, is a subsidized permanent housing program for 10 families.the scattered site housing project (sshp) is a program designed to serve adults and families with a least one HIV/AIDS-positive resident. A case manager works with eac family to maintain stable housing within one of the ten units within the community. A continuum of care is provided to move clients towards self-sufficiency by providing case management services that include educational referrals, life skills training, counseling, and medical consultations/referrals. This project differs from others because the project itself is the leaseholder and therefore responsible for paying rent and other conditions stipulated in the lease. As the leaseholder, the project is also responsible for monitoring clients on a weekly basis to ensure apartments are kept clean and free of damage. Prospective clients must meet certain criteria for consideration into the program. They must undergo an intensive needs assessment to determine and identify their individual needs and those of each member of the family. A case plan is then developed based on those needs and community resources are accessed to assist clients in completing case plan objectives. The project's goal is to enable clients to build a secure foundation through case management, life skills development, and their own self-determination. Having accomplished these goals they are then ready to take over the leases or move on to other affordable housing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.4%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.7%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.4% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $10.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $175K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $353K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.