New Jersey Association of Community Providers Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222999087
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Ewing, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6094061400
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,889,831
- Expenses
- $1,751,122
- Assets
- $2,444,910
- Liabilities
- $1,168,777
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DERRY HOLLAND LCSW (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN HANCOCK (PRESIDENT)
- JOANNA MILLER MNM (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- VALERIE SELLERS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- VALERIE SELLERS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $266,681 total reported compensation
- MAUREEN SHEA (DIRECTOR OF GOVT AFFAIRS): $103,184 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The New Jersey association of community providers (njacp) represents a dynamic community of diverse providers dedicated to advancing sustainable community based services and supports that enrich lives and build futures for people with intellectual, developmental and other disabilities across the state.
What it reported doing in 2024
The New Jersey association of community providers (njacp) has the privilege of representing more than 75 provider agencies that serve individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (idd). The New Jersey association of community providers continued the experience growth in 2024 both in terms of membership and revenue. The focus continues to be advocacy for funding for the idd community to support wage increases (and alleviate the workforce shortage of dsps as well as keep up with the rising costs of housing utilities, food and general supportive needs of individuals in the idd community. While providing unprecedented support to its membership, njacp also partnered with the nj department of higher education and the consortium of county colleges on a multi-year grant aimed at increasing the number of people entering a "caring field" in the idd community, with a focus on dsp recruitment in years 1-3. The multi-pronged approach included targeted at risk high school upper classmen who were struggling to stay in school to earn their degree while training in the dsp field, including job mentoring, shadowing and upon graduation, job placement. Additionally, adults looking to gain or change employment were offered free college credits and training, including a stipend, with job placement upon graduation. Njacp has increased its membership annually attributed in large part to the support and services it offers. Members receive a comprehensive electronic newsletter twice a week that is timely and relevant and it reflects information at the state and national level. This information is of importance as it assists providers with the planning and the implementation of services. For example, njacp has focused on bringing legislators to the table to ensure they have a better understanding of the critical role that providers of services to the idd community have. Providers of services to the intellectual and developmental disabilities community are invaluable and yet they continue to struggle with overly burdensome regulations, costs that have outpaced reimbursement rate increases and a changing system that has created unnecessary administrative burdens. Njacp plays a critical role in advocating on behalf of its membership with the understanding that it is the idd community and those being served that will benefit from a strong provider network. Toward that end, advocacy is at the forefront of njacp's strategic agenda. Success can be measured, in part, by the number of legislators that have visited with njacp's members; more than 17 in 2024. Such attendance and interaction has been made possible by the visibility that njacp has achieved over the past several years; that has allowed njacp to become a voice that is now being heard in trenton. Supporting njacp's membership can only serve to support the consumers they serve. This effort will always be a critical objective of njacp.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.4; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.1%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.6% of revenue deployed · 87.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $267K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.