New Hope in Christ International Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300032053
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Estero, FL, USA
- Phone
- 2399480546
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $4,175
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDSON SOUZA (PRESIDENT/DI)
People named in this filing
- EDSON SOUZA (PRESIDENT/DI)
- STAN MCLEMORE (DIRECTOR)
- GEORGE YAPUNICH (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
In response to the great commission, new hope in christ international ministries works as an advocate for every poor child and their families in the slums of brazil to realease them from their spiritual, economic, social and physical poverty and enable them to become responsible and fulfilled followers of christ.
What it reported doing in 2013
New hope in christ international ministries is a christ centered and community focused and partners with local churches. Every child and family has an opportunity to hear, see and respond to the gospel in age-appropriate and culturally relevant setting. Families in the slum areas are engaged with dignity, unconditional love and the eternal hope found in jesus christ. Churches are assisted in planting missional churches that teach, train and mentor children and their families in accordance with god's word.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 74.5%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -52.7% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -52.5% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -46.3% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.