Hillel Academy of Broome County
Legal name: New Hillel Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 150624960
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2009
- Location
- Vestal, New York, United States
- Phone
- (607) 304-4544
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $436,806
- Expenses
- $372,213
- Assets
- $343,749
- Liabilities
- $5,916
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALEX KAMINSKY (PRESIDENT)
- TARA KAMINSKY (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MAREN NASAR (TREASURER)
- RHIANNON FOSTER (SECRETARY)
- ALEX KAMINSKY (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hillel Academy of Broome County is a pluralistic Jewish day school educating students in a nurturing environment, from Pre-Kindergarten to Fifth Grade. Hillel Academy develops lifelong learners, critical thinkers, and caring individuals who are passionate about Judaism, and will make lasting contributions to the Jewish community, American society, and the world-at-large.
What it reported doing in 2023
Provide religious day school to elementary students. Kindergarten through 5th grade
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.2%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 76.2% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $333K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.