New Hampshire Supreme Courthistorical Society Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205833959
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Concord, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6036263304
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Administration of Justice, Courts
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,708
- Expenses
- $5,238
- Assets
- $128,381
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Benjamin King (President)
People named in this filing
- Benjamin King (President)
- John W Pramberg (Treasurer)
- Nick Abramson (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote an understanding and appreciation of the New Hampshire Supreme Court and the judiciary of the state of New Hampshire, including without limitation, by sponsoring lectures and other educational events; preserving and cataloging historical documents and materials and producing & desseminating educational materials.
What it reported doing in 2025
Oral History Project: An ongoing endeavor, cosponsored by the N.H. Bar Foundation, that produces, films, edits and disseminates to the general public, via YouTube, interviews that record the experiences and perspectives of members of the N.H. bar and judiciary.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 20
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10.5%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 33.5%; rating input score 34
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 68.6%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 24.51; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 10.5% of revenue deployed · 33.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 25 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.