New Hampshire Library Trustees Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 020360414
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2009, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Concord, NH, USA
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $64,882
- Expenses
- $72,164
- Assets
- $121,074
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Marcia McLaughlin (President)
- Cathy Harvey (Vice President)
- Conrad Moses (Past President)
People named in this filing
- Marcia McLaughlin (President)
- Cathy Harvey (Vice President)
- Kathryn Parenti (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
NHLTAs primary exempt purpose is to develop a more effective body of public library trustees by providing educational opportunities to assist in understanding the responsibilities and duties of the position.
What it reported doing in 2024
Training public library trustees to be knowledgeable and effective in order to serve improve and promote NH public libraries. Approximately 301 people attended the Annual Conference and 157 people attended regional educational workshops.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 78.1%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.68; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 78.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.