New Hampshire Grange Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300615883
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Newmarket, NH, USA
Phone
6036866404
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,002
Expenses
$15,632
Assets
$116,652
Liabilities
$500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • James Tetreault (President)
  • John Porter (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • James Tetreault (President)
  • John Porter (Vice President)
  • Tara Sad (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose of the New Hampshire Grange Foundation is to raise, receive, and distribute funds that allow it to: provide financial assistance to New Hampshire residents seeking post-secondary education; to provide assistance to New Hampshire residents who seek to broaden their educational pursuits; to promote interest in and provide financial support for localized agricultural endeavors in New Hampshire; and to promote interest in and provide financial support for projects and programs conducted by Grange divisions in New Hampshire.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide financial assistance to New Hampshire residents seeking post-secondary education. 4 Scholarships totaling $15,000 for students attending college in 2025-2026.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.46; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.6% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.