New England Partners in Faith Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 542143890
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Springfield, MA, USA
- Phone
- 4132722200
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $63,661
- Expenses
- $60,000
- Assets
- $3,661
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIMOTHY PAUL BAYMON (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- HERIBERTO FLORES (CHAIRMAN)
- TIMOTHY PAUL BAYMON (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- DANIEL KNAPIK (CLERK/TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
New england partners in faith provides capacity-building technical assistance and training tovarious faith-based agencies in the region. Nepif also serves low-income, unemployed and under-employed individuals of faith-based organizations by providing employment counseling, financial literacy training and stabilization services.
What it reported doing in 2022
New england partners in faith provides capacity-building technical assistance and training to various faith-based agencies in the region. Nepif also serves low-income, unemployed and under-employed individuals of faith-based organizations by providing employment counseling, financial literacy training and stabilization services. New england partners in faith has accomplished it's mission by contributing to hope community development corporation that benefits the community in accordance with the above stated purpose.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.2%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.