New England Fusion Fastpitch
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813464690
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Hudson, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6038821978
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Football
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $392,613
- Expenses
- $374,125
- Assets
- $356,614
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETE MISIASZEK (Vice President)
- MICHAEL COOPER (President)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID JOHNSON (Treasurer): $12,000 total reported compensation
- PETE MISIASZEK (Vice President): $12,000 total reported compensation
- RON JACKSON (Secretary): $4,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The goal of the New England Fusion Fastpitch is to prepare girls to learn and play the game of softball in a fun, healthy and safe environment. We emphasize the importance of respect for teammates, opponents, coaches and officials. We strive to teach game and life skills while building lasting relationships with good friends.
What it reported doing in 2025
LAFA complex NE Fusion is providing live streaming services for all our players and college coaches as well as all our teams playing in all our College showcases NE Fusion has expanding our services for live streaming to other programs Londonderry Lighting 8u,10u and 12u teams, volleyball, soccer, and gymnastics events. 1200 players and parents benefiting
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 55
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 88.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $332K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $12K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.