New England Aeronautical Institute Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873777310
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Portsmouth, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6033058565
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Higher Education Institutions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $7,595
- Assets
- $2,977
- Liabilities
- $42,300
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRIANT FLOURIS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GEORGE ANTONIADIS (CHAIR)
- NICHOLAS BERTOZZI (BOARD MEMBER)
- CONSTANTINOS COUTIFARIS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
New england aeronautical institute is a not for profit institution of higher education.the activity is educational services at university level, including academic training.this activity is conducted by the institution, its faculty and administrative staff. This is an onlineinstitution. It is headquartered in the state of New Hampshire. 100 percent of the corporation's time isallocated to this activity. The main funding mechanism of the activity is tuition fees and all overallexpenses are allocated to the activity.the educational services activity is an institution of higher education that promotes aviation educationin the state of New Hampshire as well as nationally and internationally due to its online nature. Not forprofit is a typical model of activity in higher education as it is best suited to support students throughreasonable tuition and scholarships.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provide educational services at university level, including academic training, in the field of avaiation education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 14.21; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.