New Earth

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200617692
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2009
Location
York, ME, USA
Phone
2073518690
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$35,408
Assets
$172,527
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Gregory A Norris (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Gregory A Norris (Executive Director)
  • Bob Berkebile (Chair)
  • Catherine Benoit Norris (Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of New Earth is to stimulate sustainable development of companies and communities. New Earth engages companies through the development of assessment systems (software, databases, and methods) so that those companies who assess and improve their impacts on society and the environment can prosper. New Earth works with communities (voluntary associations) by administering a global fund for community-driven sustainable development.

What it reported doing in 2021

Handprinter - Encourages both citizens and businesses to take actions which create positive environmental and social benefits, or "footprint reductions", in order to ultimately become net-positive on as many sustainability impact categories as possible.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 46.3%; rating input score 46

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.87; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2016 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.