New Concord Feral Cats Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991074780
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- New Concord, OH, USA
- Phone
- 7406070684
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $118,860
- Expenses
- $89,799
- Assets
- $33,663
- Liabilities
- $4,602
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL WARD (PRESIDENT/DI)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL WARD (PRESIDENT/DI)
- LEE KEITH SCOTT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To rescue and improve the lives of feral and homeless cats. Our purpose is to rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome the cats, promoting their physical and emotional health while advocating for responsible and humane feline population control. Through community education, we strive to raise awareness about their welfare and advocate for compassionate population control. Our goal is to create a world where all cats have a chance for a happy and healthy life.
What it reported doing in 2024
The primary activities involve rescuing feral and homeless cats in new concord, Ohio. Activities include trapping, sheltering, feeding and making arrangements with local veterinarians for medical care. The organization pays for neuter and spay surgeries as well as other necessary products and services, prepares cats for adoption, locates suitable homes, and reports acts of abuse and cruelty to appropriate agencies. The organization makes referrals and provides resources to other local individuals and organizations that care for homeless cats. It also attempts to improve the quality of their lives and the treatment they receive by members of the community through awareness campaigns and promotional programs. Directors, officers, staff members, interns and volunteers are available for assistance and actively promote, educate and advocate for their humane, compassionate, kind and loving care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.7%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.7% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $79K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.