New Concepts Tutor Mentor Connections

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364257958
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Homewood, IL, USA
Phone
3123712161
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Reported finances

Revenue
$77,595
Expenses
$80,059
Assets
$9,480
Liabilities
$30,915

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kenneth H King II (President)

People named in this filing

  • Kenneth H King II (President)
  • Jennifer Turner (Treasurer)
  • Harold Triche (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Supplemental education through job readiness training which includes college prep classes, job shadowing, internships, career awareness workshops, baseball and mentoring of middle school and high school age at youths in the Chicago metro area.

What it reported doing in 2017

Career Day workshops and Corporate job shadow days at Chicago area high schools and middle schools served over 6000 youth and within the GEAR UP program. South suburban at risk boys were mentored thru participation in a youth baseball team.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 22
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22.2%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 22

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.26; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 60.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -24.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22.2% of revenue deployed · 21.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.