New City Arts Initiative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271865371
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Charlottesville, VA, USA
Phone
4342025277
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$364,446
Expenses
$336,631
Assets
$253,076
Liabilities
$3,408

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KORI PRICE (PRESIDENT)
  • DERRICK J WALLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MAUREEN BRONDYKE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MAUREEN BRONDYKE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $83,276 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We envision the charlottesville area as a place where a thriving group of local artists unsettles and transforms our community to work toward a more just, beautiful future.

What it reported doing in 2024

Vocation: we are committed to helping make charlottesville a place where artists can live and work. In response to artists' needs, we offer free studio space, a low-commission gallery, artist grants, and networking opportunities. From july 1, 2024 through june 30, 2025, new city arts supported 150 charlottesville-area artists and 7,555 total arts participants who engaged with this work. During this timeframe, $90,061 was distributed to charlottesville-area artists through commissions, honorariums, stipends, and sales, alongside artwork acquisitions or commissions by local facilities who partnered with new city arts to build their permanent collection, create rotating exhibitions, or launched open calls to commission artists for new works.new city arts' programs are primarily project-based and support emerging artists in the charlottesville area (charlottesville, albemarle, greene, nelson, louisa, fluvanna, orange, buckingham) who are often creating installations, durational works, or experimental projects. Annually, more than 50% of the artists new city arts serves are artists of color and include aging artists, teenage artists, differently abled artists, and queer artists. We support their work through a community-based curatorial process and a portfolio of physical spaces and funding including an exhibition space, free studio space, fellowships, and grants.for each exhibiting artist, new city arts provided installation support, exhibition stipends, teaching artist honorariums, and professional photography which can be found at newcityarts.org. The new city arts residency program provided 5 months of free studio space and project stipends for 2 artists. Through the new city arts fellowship, new city arts rented studio space and provided a project stipend for 4 artists whose work culminated in a group show at welcome gallery.unique to new city arts is a missional commitment to make charlottesville a place where artists can live and work, which requires a comprehensive programming approach to support artists beyond our gallery walls with funding and studio space. New city arts strongly considers both the form (what is produced) and the process by which work is created (by whom, for whom, and how) in order to address unjust systems of power historically upheld by art spaces and support curatorial power by artists and community members. In 2024, the organization adopted a 2026-2029 strategic plan co-created by charlottesville-area artists and arts audiences.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.7%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $47.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.7%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.7% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $297K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $83K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.