New Chamber Ballet Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822750241
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6465398657
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $130,241
- Expenses
- $98,727
- Assets
- $48,751
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- MIRO MAGLOIRE (CHAIRPERSON, ARTISTIC DIRECTOR)
- LESLIE TONNER CURTIS (VICE-CHAIRPERSON)
- SANDRA TSANG COHEN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To produce and present, independently and in concert with other institutions and individuals, dance productions and other events of a similar nature, and to educate the general public as well as professional artists and students by offering instructional classes, lectures, and workshops.
What it reported doing in 2025
Produced a series of performances of contemporary ballet with live music presented in New York city and on tour nationally and internationally, with high-quality, original work offered to the audiences in a format designed to keep ticket prices affordable. 16 public performances of 8different programs, including original ballets and commissioned scores, with an audience of closeto 3,000 in attendance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 96.9%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 96.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $96K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.