New Center Community Mental Health Properties Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382654903
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Detroit, MI, USA
- Phone
- 3139613700
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,399,359
- Expenses
- $1,874,490
- Assets
- $4,748,506
- Liabilities
- $3,142,962
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOY CALLOWAY (CEO)
- TIFFANY DANIEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOY CALLOWAY (CEO): $116,754 total reported compensation
- TIFFANY DANIEL (VICE PRESIDENT): $64,766 total reported compensation
- JAMES O'DONNELL (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $30,664 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To hold property and pay expenses for the benefit of new center community mental health services
What it reported doing in 2016
The company was formed to hold property, collect income and distribute the remaining funds, less expenses, to new center community mental health services, (EIN 38-2282236), a Michigan nonprofit corporation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.53; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.66; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.