New Canaan High School Parent & Faculty Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
342004117
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
New Canaan, CT, USA
Phone
2035944601
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,765
Expenses
$149,470
Assets
$116,806
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KRISTEN GRZYMSKI (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • TIA WHINERY (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • JULIE O'BRIEN DEASY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ALLY DUNLAP (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH DEMUTH (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ALYSSA RESNICK (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KRISTEN GRZYMSKI (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • TIA WHINERY (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • JULIE O'BRIEN DEASY (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The new canaan high school parents and faculty association, inc ("pfa") was developed to promote a strong working relationship between the parents of new canaan high school students, its faculty, staff and administration so that all may contribute effectively to the education of its students. To this purpose, the pfa sponsors and/or funds several enrichhment programs and activities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Leadership award programs

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 69% for direct work, and 31% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 82.9%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.6% of revenue deployed · 82.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $124K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.