New Brighton Middle School Home and School Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770564547
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Capitola, CA, USA
Phone
8312397631
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$49,744
Expenses
$55,423
Assets
$47,160

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANA PAULA SANTEE (Co-President)
  • MARIE MILLER (Vice President)
  • NUMA TREPANIER (Co-President)

People named in this filing

  • ANA PAULA SANTEE (Co-President)
  • ELISA GARCIA (Treasurer)
  • MARIE MILLER (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

New brighton middle school foundation organizes fundraisers and activities to raise money for augmenting the educational activities of new brighton middle school in capitola, California.

What it reported doing in 2022

The year's accomplishments by the new brighton middle school home and school club typically are as follows: monthly bike to school events garden support for healthy living class honor roll breakfast/bumper stickers student of the month monthly pizza lunches & bumper stickers teacher appreciation lunch pies for turkey trot studlent prizes planners for students 8th grade graduation balloon arch & programs after achool sports-athletic director stipend & coaches stipends spring fundraising auction

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.4%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.1% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $50K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.