New Beginnings Reentry Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811525549
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Roxbury, MA, USA
- Phone
- 8573331206
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitation Services for Offenders
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $420,523
- Expenses
- $421,464
- Assets
- $286,254
- Liabilities
- $44,702
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- STACEY K BORDEN (EXEC DIR BOARD MEMBER)
- IRWIN NESOFF (CHAIR)
- GRETCHEN MOORE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to work to reduce recidivism by advocating for and providing services to women who are reentering local neighborhoods and communities. We work to build alliances collaborations and networks to create positive changes in policies that negatively impact women involved in the criminal justice system.
What it reported doing in 2025
New beginnings holistically provides reentry services for women in the boston area and offers them the highest chance of success to permanently return to their families and communities.through our programs and services clients learn to express feelings appropriately improving their social skills and relationships while strengthening the innumerable roles they play in their personal and professional lives. There has been evidence that those who received drama therapy show a significant improvement in their self-image self-esteem and self-discipline.refer to schedule o for additional program information trauma-informed services new beginnings provides trauma-informed services. We recognize that trauma plays a role in justice involvement. Trauma is common among women in the criminal justice system with an estimated 96 percent of women reporting at least one traumatic event in their lifetime and many have experienced on average six different traumatic events. Although traumatic experiences can affect both men and women involved in the justice system women experience trauma at a higher rate than men do and also more often experience negative consequences of trauma e.g. Post-traumatic stress disorder. Trauma may be experienced through events such as abuse or neglect and historical events such as the holocaust and slavery among others. Traumatic events particularly exposure to repeated events can impact the structure and function of the brain - especially in younger individuals - and influence subsequent coping responses to stress and everyday life events. This may result in unhealthy detrimental responses to stressful situations. Nbrs includes trauma-informed practices to effectively address each womans experiences. Covid -19 outreach and educationin Massachusetts covid-19 has turned prisons and jails into virus hot zones. Dozens of inmates died and infections were on the rise. The crisis prompted corrections officials to release many women with no place to go. New beginnings has worked with the boston health commission to provide much needed ppe housing and other resources to formerly incarcerated women.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 72% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 75.3%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 75.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $317K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 43 of 43 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.