New Art City Theatre
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922945597
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Ventura, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2034346119
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $330,700
- Expenses
- $270,479
- Assets
- $235,657
- Liabilities
- $9,162
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NEAL LASSILA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BEVERLY WARD (FOUNDER/V PR): $50,900 total reported compensation
- KIRBY WARD (FOUNDER/ARTI): $33,650 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To forge a new path to opportunity for artists who create theatre. By giving equal access to diverse voices, and inviting a broader audience to join us, we aspire to elevate all that is compelling about original theatre and its ability to promote unity, inspire curiosity, and provide joy.
What it reported doing in 2024
New art city theatre (nact) is an incubator of new works for the american stage. Launched in early 2023, the artistic aim is to find and develop plays and musicals originating from both emerging playwrights as well as established artists in the field. These effors at nact are rooted in community-building, ensuring that the experiece of artist and audience are given equal consideration when the company produces work that fulfills its mission to promote unity, inspire curiosity, and provide joy. Organizational goals are reached through: -new art city theatre's festival of new works - an annual four-day festival of new plays and musicals that takes place once a year and plays hosts to writers from across the nation. For six weeks each year, nact accepts submissions of plays or musicals from writers who reside anywhere in the USA. Each submission is assessed by multiple readers as part of a months- long blind screening process requiring the help of a 40-50 person volunteer team, all overseen by the artistic leadership at the company. At the completion of the reading rounds, four new plays or musicals are selected to be presented at the festival. Nact brins the writers to souther California for an intensive week-long residency where they're given the resources of time, space, materials, professional actors, and directors. Each project is brought to life a public staged readings where tickets are free. Audience feedback is encouraged at post-show talk backs where authors and attendees exchange ideas in a positive and structured format. -in the studio series - added to nact programming in 2025, the in the studio reading series is a collaboration between nact and studio channel islands in camarillo, ca where works that may or may not have already been read at nact are present to attendees for feedback at post-show talkbacks. This series is also presented to the community free of charge.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 51
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.8%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 62%; rating input score 62
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 42.9%; rating input score 43; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.2%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 49.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 76.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.8% of revenue deployed · 62% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $168K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $51K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 43/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.