New Alternatives Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953244085
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6195430293
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,156,594
- Expenses
- $34,580,651
- Assets
- $50,984,014
- Liabilities
- $17,520,116
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ME BRUICH (C.E.O.): $531,370 total reported compensation
- LINDA NICHOLS (QUALITY ASSU): $307,867 total reported compensation
- KLEA GALASSO (SR. PROGRAM): $286,003 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
New alternatives, inc. Is committed to providing abused and negelected youth with hope and opportunities through a comprehensive array of social, residential and mental health services that we provide in san diego and orange county.
What it reported doing in 2024
Children, families and youth- the core of new alternatives' system of care for children is residential and foster care. The residential programs operated by the agency accept referrals from san diego and orange county agencies, such as the children and family services, mental health services and juvenile probation department. During 2024, the agency operated multiple residential facilities in san diego county and orange county. These facilities provide a safe and stable living environment, with nearly 230 residential treatment beds that serve hundreds of clients annually, ages 6 to 18. The residential programs provide twenty-four hour adult supervision of children in a safe and nurturing setting and provide services to families that encourage the maximum permissible child/family contact. The youth attend either on or off grounds public or non-public schools depending upon individual needs. The agency also provides specialized residential services including sibling assessment programs, specialized treatment for sexual abuse victims, transitional living for adolescents and specialized programs for young children. New alternatives' in-home service programs provide care for victims of abuse and neglect by using emergency caretakers, respite care, parenting education and parent aides. The agency's array of prevention and intervention services are designed to keep children at home while endsuring their safety and well-being. These services are provided to a wide range of families such as those at risk of having their children removed from their homes, relatives who voluntarily assume the role of caregiver, and families at risk due to family violence and poverty. The goal of all the programs is to provide early treatment in an effort to preserve the family unit. The service programs include: in-home crisis counseling; in-home support and parent education; teaching and demonstrating home making services; in-home parental aides; parenting classes; monitored visistation and transportation. New alternative's foster finding agency certifies foster parents who are committed to providing a stable home for difficult to place youth. New alternatives places county court dependents in these families homes and provides support to the foster family until the county locates permanent placement for the children. Foster parents come from diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds and bring a variety of life experiences to their roles as "specialized parents". Foster parents are provided with comprehensive training and new alternatives' support staff is available twenty-four hours a day. New alternatives operates mental health programs that serve a wide range of youth and families in a variety of settings such as: out patient, day treat, school classrooms, home and residential facilities. Program services are client and family centered and designed to meet the unique needs of each individual. Program staff work within the client's family system. Mental health services include assessment; case management; individual, group and family therapy; psychiatric services and medication monitoring.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 92.6%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.47; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 92.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $531K · 16 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.