Nevada Right to Life

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860670279
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Reno, NV, USA
Phone
7753846001
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$48,880
Expenses
$54,857
Assets
$36,541
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MELISSA CLEMENT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KATHLEEN ROSSI (PRESIDENT)
  • JEREMY MCNEIL (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MELISSA CLEMENT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KATHLEEN ROSSI (PRESIDENT)
  • JEREMY MCNEIL (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Nevada right to life is a statewide, non-profit, non-sectarian, non-partisan advocacy organization. We are the state affiliate of the national right to life committee, the nation's oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. Nvrtl advocates for the right to life and right to life issues through education, legislation, political action, and public advocacy.

What it reported doing in 2020

Legislative, voter, and advocacy outreach for right to life issues throughout the state of Nevada.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.8%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: 50.6%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -41.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -55.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.8% of revenue deployed · 50.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.