Nevada Nurses Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
880088846
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Reno, NV, USA
Phone
7757472333
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$144,130
Expenses
$130,512
Assets
$305,567
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Starla Gallagher (Executive Director)
  • Nicola Aaker (President)
  • Diane McGinnis (Vice President)
  • Victoria Squier (District 1 President)
  • Delos Jones (District 3 President)

People named in this filing

  • Starla Gallagher (Executive Director)
  • Nicola Aaker (President)
  • Diane McGinnis (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The association published a quarterly journal and monthly newsletter providing continuing education and networking opportunities. These publications also provide publication opportunities and stand as a reliable resource for nursing information, news, updates, and legal matters for nurses and members. The association also lobbies for causes that affect or could affect the nursing profession while also sponsoring grants, scholarships and events that improve the nursing profession and community health while promoting education and quality care for patients.

What it reported doing in 2024

The association published a quarterly journal and monthly newsletter providing continuing education and networking opportunities to nurses. This publication is also classified as a journal giving nurses journal publication opportunities and both the quarterly journal and monthly newsletter provide a reliable source of information on current nursing events, nursing opportunities, political occurrences, and research based practices.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.4%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.34; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.