Neuropathy Action Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204792248
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Santa Ana, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7145509155
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Neurology, Neuroscience
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,132
- Expenses
- $38,177
- Assets
- $382,192
- Liabilities
- $450
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dominick V Spatafora (President)
People named in this filing
- Dominick V Spatafora (President)
- Christopher DeSantis (Executive Dir.)
- James D Lee JD (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate the general public, healthcare providers, patients and decision makers on what Neuropathy is and to help Neuropathy patients obtain access to individualized treatments.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025 the NAF released a white paper titled, Clinical Trials for Neuropathy: Looking Ahead. The paper looks at how clinical trials are developing and why participation remains a critical part of discovering new therapies. We are proud to release Clinical Trials for Neuropathy: Looking Ahead, said Dominick Spatafora, NAF board president. This study helped us take a closer look at whats working, whats emerging, and how we can continue to move toward treating and preventing neuropathy. The report explores the categories that trials are currently underway: medication and biologics, regenerative or gene-related therapies, nerve-stimulation devices, and technology like virtual-reality programs or wearable monitors.The investigation also highlights innovation in the field, including precision medicine, AI tools, and new trial designs that may shorten the time it takes to understand whether a treatment works.Despite the promising aspects of neuropathic treatments, federal funding is a concern. While the biopharmaceutical industry invested more than $200 billion in research and development in 2024, recent federal budget cuts have reduced public funding for neuropathy research. This gap puts greater pressure on private investment and patient participation to keep new therapies moving forward.The study further outlines the importance of patient representation. Many communities especially older adults, women, and people from racial and ethnic minority groups remain underrepresented in neuropathy trials. The paper points out that the reasons are usually practical ones: transportation, lack of clear information, language differences, or simply not knowing a trial exists. Inclusivity is not just a scientific priority; it is a moral one. If we want treatments that work for everyone, then everyone needs a fair chance to participate. Breaking down barriers and expanding outreach will make future therapies stronger, safer, and more effective.The paper closes by encouraging more conversation between clinicians, caregivers, and patients. Community groups and advocates can also help by sharing trustworthy trial information and encouraging more people to ask questions. To access the full white paper, please visit www.neuropathyaction.org.Additionally, since its founding in 2006, the NAF has remained committed to providing neuropathy patients with essential resources to access individualized medications, IVIG, and other treatments through patient empowerment and strategic advocacy. To this end, in 2025 the NAF: Broadened our participation in national and state coalitions to maximize our impact. o To this end the NAF was part of eighteen various state and national coalitions in 2025. Expanded advocacy efforts beyond the states to national issues that impact patient access to medications, impact affordability, and research efforts. o To this end the NAF had over fifty engagements on various federal issues that impacted neuropathy awareness, funding, or access to treatments/medications. Continued our focus on state policy ensuring patients are protected from copay diversion programs, step therapy, prior authorizations, non-medical switching, and other harmful third party (health plan, government, PBM, etc.) practices. o To this end the NAF had over one hundred engagements in the states on various awareness, education, and access issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 70%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.01; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36% of revenue deployed · 70% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.