Neurofit Networks Inc Dba Parkinson Wellness Recovery Pwr
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273309190
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tucson, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5205915346
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,052,200
- Expenses
- $1,946,863
- Assets
- $1,347,079
- Liabilities
- $695,460
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY PEUTE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLY PEUTE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $132,350 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enhance access to and awareness of research driven exercise that improves quality of life for people with parkinson disease.
What it reported doing in 2024
Continuing education for therapy and exercise professionals - each year, pwr! Conducts in person and virtual workshops to train and certify physical and occupational therapists and exercise professionals in the pwr! Moves methodology. Pwr! Workshops are unique in the continuing education arena because of live demonstrations and practica featuring volunteers with pd, which gives participants the opportunity to observe, learn, and then practice the skills being taught. Therapist workshops teach how to design comprehensive, individualized therapy programs for people with pd that address multiple symptoms across varying levels of functionality. Instructor workshops teach participants how to design and teach community group exercise programs utilizing large and fast functional movements (based on the pwr! Moves) to decrease the symptoms of pd in participants. Together, these workshops train professionals to create a clinical-to-community model of care for people with pd to maintain function and quality of life using appropriately timed bouts of therapeutic intervention with continued community-based exercise programs in between bouts. To date, pwr! Has trained over 12,000 therapists and instructors who are providing pd-specialized programs around the globe.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 93
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 79.5%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 79.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $132K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.