For Good
Legal name: Network for Good
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680480736
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, US
- Phone
- 1-888-284-7978
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $204,438,959
- Expenses
- $231,587,451
- Assets
- $96,164,639
- Liabilities
- $77,208,307
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ABIGAIL ROSS (CEO)
- SCOTT CASE (CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ABIGAIL ROSS (CEO): $386,713 total reported compensation
- CATHERINE DUNLOP (SVP, PARTNERSHIPS (THRU 9/2024)): $329,423 total reported compensation
- STEPHANIE GOLDFINE (GENERAL COUNSEL, ASSISTANT SECRETARY): $300,933 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To help you support any charity, anywhere online – in a convenient and secure manner.
What it reported doing in 2024
What we've accomplished:- exceeded $5.4 billion in cumulative donations raised for close to 446,000 nonprofits since inception.- raised $202 million in donations in 2024 to over 22,000 different nonprofits.- provided tens of millions in critical funding to meet the needs of charities in a year of continued unprecedented need where climate-driven disasters impact communities across the country. Money supported community relief including food banks, disaster response organizations, and other critical social service organizations that frontline communities depend on for support.- for corporations and organizations that want to do good, we invested in streamlining our operations to improve how we support partners who have consumer giving programs by giving to and recommending grants from our donor advised fund or using our iframe, and weblinks products. This includes compliance with ab488 and other best practices for safely and securely helping donors support the charities they care about.- created a specific business unit to create a thriving and impactful philanthropy sector supported by seamless collaboration between giving platforms focusing on building community and sharing resources.- continued to explore ways we can expand on our mission. This work included continued learning sessions with executives across philanthropy, technology, and innovation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97.8%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: $80.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.1%; rating input score 99; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.8; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $226.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $387K · 16 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.4M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 41 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4743 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4733 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.