Netivey Ohr Yaakov Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461854264
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Lakewood, NJ, USA
Phone
7329949466
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$460,655
Expenses
$349,396
Assets
$302,881
Liabilities
$435,200

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • YOSEF D MICHAEL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSEPH ESSES (VICE PRESIDE)
  • PINCHAS ZEV FISHELIS (SECRETARY)
  • YOSEF D MICHAEL (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide education and financial assistance to jewish children and adults. The goal is to enhance the community by providing educational materials, counseling services for married couples, disadvantaged youths, expecting mothers and impoverished adults. To more effectively accomplish its mission, the board has decided to grant funds to existing organizations located around the world that support the mission of netivey ohr yaakov inc.

What it reported doing in 2022

Provided education and financial assistance to jewish children and adults. The goal is to enhance the community by providing educational materials, counseling services for married couples, disadvantaged youths, expecting mothers and impoverished adults. To more effectively accomplish its mission, the board has decided to grant funds to existing organizations located around the world that support the mission of netivey ohr yaakov inc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.6%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 99.7%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.44; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.6% of revenue deployed · 99.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $348K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.