Net Treatment Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222697033
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2154517000
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,677,837
Expenses
$18,511,959
Assets
$11,512,091
Liabilities
$13,814,268

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REGAN KELLY (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • CHRISTOPHER WAITERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • REGAN KELLY (PRESIDENT/CEO): $436,310 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTOPHER WAITERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $192,370 total reported compensation
  • JAMES STRAUSS (TREASURER (UNTIL 08/22)): $167,128 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of net community care, which operates two community umbrella (cua) contracts, is to stregthen families and increase protective factors of parents and caretakers through active community partnerships and collaboration. The principles of cultural competency, recovery, resiliency, wellness, community integration and strengths-based planning service as a strong foundation for our work. The vision is that stregthened community partnerships will further develop resources that support youth and families. Communities will improve the safety, permanency and well-being outcomes for youth and families.

What it reported doing in 2022

Community umbrella agency (cua) 1 and community umbrella agency 7: net treatment services, inc. (nts), dba. Net community care (ncc) operates two community umbrella agencies (cuas) in north central and eastern north philadelphia neighborhoods (25th and 22nd police districts, cua regions 1 and 7). These regions encompass some of the most challenging social issues in terms of high rates of poverty, domestic and community violence, and exposure of youth and families to trauma. Cuas serve as the cornerstone of the department of human services' effort to transform child welfare. The primary role of the cua is to provide case management services to all families in the region that areaccepted for child wefare services by the department of human services.each cua has a community engagement department that works closely with a community advisory board (cab) which helps keep the cua connected to community priorities outside of case-management. The cua relationship with it's cab is essential to ensuring that the cua is supporting any initiatives that can support prevention and community building in the regions we serve. Thus, the cuas are fully integrated into the community and work with community partners to ensure that the four tenants are a priority for all, the tenants are to 1) keep children safe in their own homes and communities 2) expedite permanency when formal placement is necessary 3) reduced dependency on congregate care usage and 4) to positively impact child and family functioning. As of june 30, 2023, ncc cuas serviced over 600 families and over 1600 individual children during this period. Over 60% of the children receiving cua services received them in their homes or in the homes of kin while less than 40% required out of home placement in traditional foster care settings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.6%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1,864.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.7%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.2; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.6% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $436K · 8 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.