Nes-aua Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203214327
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Beverly, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9789278330
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $78,015
- Expenses
- $95,449
- Assets
- $39,087
- Liabilities
- $44,836
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VERNON M PAIS JR MD (PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT ELECT)
- STEVEN J SHICHMAN MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT/HISTORIAN)
- GREGORY S ADEY MD (PAST PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VERNON M PAIS JR MD (PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT ELECT)
- STEVEN J SHICHMAN MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT/HISTORIAN)
- GREGORY S ADEY MD (PAST PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
(a) to serve as the arm and instrument of the new england section in socio-economic and legislative matters affecting the medical practices of its members, including support of the aua in related efforts.(b) to initiate and support urologic practice management efforts in the new england states.(c) to advocate and support urologic practice management efforts in the new england states.(d) to serve as liason with the government affairs and practice management personnel and activities of the american urological association.
What it reported doing in 2024
Grants to encourage the study of and to maintain the highest possible standard for urological education, practice, and research.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.6%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.15; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.6% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.