Nemacolin Energy Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452642763
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Farmington, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7243296662
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $129,250
- Expenses
- $174,878
- Assets
- $70,237
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DENNIS NOONAN (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- EDWARD BURGHARD (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
People named in this filing
- DENNIS NOONAN (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- EDWARD BURGHARD (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- JAMES SAMUEL (SECRETARY/DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Nemacolin energy institute (nei) is devoted to providing energy education, information, and a means of connecting energy-industry stakeholders. Nei was launched to help public and private sector leaders, and the public, understand the facts about energy sources including the important role shale gas can play in moving america to energy independence; to foster local, regional and national energy-planning decisions based on facts and not misunderstanding.
What it reported doing in 2014
Nei held two events during 2014 which included the national coal conference and shale energy conference. The events brought key people together with the right information to address some of america's most difficult energy challenges. Providing public and private sector leaders with evidence based information regarding opportunities and hurdles to energy independence in america.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -35.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -15.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 39.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $113K reported
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2012 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.