Neighbors in the Strip Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061699332
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4123897378
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $55,132
- Expenses
- $29,759
- Assets
- $115,351
- Liabilities
- $3,044
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAMELA AUSTIN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PAMELA AUSTIN (PRESIDENT)
- CORY BONNET (BOARD MEMBER)
- CORIN GIGLIO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's purpose is to promote economic development and a high quality of life, while preserving the personality, integrity, and character of the area in downtown pittsburgh known as the strip district.
What it reported doing in 2025
1. Assisted a variety of businesses wishing to locate in the strip district. Assistance included help with obtaining government assistance, grants and loans, code and zoning issues, and obtaining variances. 2. Provided public information and neighborhood promotion through a website, facebook, and twitter. 3. Published a monthly newsletter which is distributed to members and the public at large.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.3%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.88; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.3% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.