Neighborhood Villages Action Fund Inc C/o Neighborhood Villages Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873229515
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Jamaica Plain, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6176458031
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $238,976
- Expenses
- $239,273
- Assets
- $17,199
- Liabilities
- $8,828
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAUREN KENNEDY (CO-PRESIDENT / TREASURER)
- SARAH MUNCEY (CO-PRESIDENT / CLERK)
Highest reported compensation
- SARAH MUNCEY (CO-PRESIDENT / CLERK): $176,527 total reported compensation
- LAUREN KENNEDY (CO-PRESIDENT / TREASURER): $164,885 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The neighborhood villages action fund fights for state and federal legislation to create an equitable and affordable early education and care system that works for families, providers, and educators.
What it reported doing in 2022
The neighborhood villages action fund (nvaf) advocates for state and federal legislation to create an equitable, accessible, and high-quality early education and care system. We prioritize partnering with parents, providers, and educators to lift-up the voices of those most impacted by the child care crisis; our priority is to ensure that those voices are heard by elected leaders and policymakers. Nvaf is fighting to make universal, affordable, high-quality early education and care a reality for all families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.9%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 56.8%; rating input score 57
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -91.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.9% of revenue deployed · 56.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $136K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $177K · 6 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.