Neighborhood Urban Family Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954688670
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Pasadena, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6266766540
- Rating
- 34
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,332
- Expenses
- $203,863
- Assets
- $31,074
- Liabilities
- $15,941
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Roger Van Spronsen (President)
- Jennifer Wiebe (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Roger Van Spronsen (President)
- Jennifer Wiebe (Vice President)
- David Ligon (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate, train, and nurture at-risk elementary students through afterschool programs. Organization operates Can-Do Kids Clubs, which serve children in Pasadena, CA.
What it reported doing in 2021
Can-do Kids club - provided after school tutoring and enrichment programs primarily low-income elementary students in Pasadena, CA. The program continued on-line until the Pasadena Unified School District returned to in person teaching. One site was able to reopen for the remaining weeks of the 2021 school year with limited number of students in attendance at any time. Both on-line and in person, the students were offered support and educational assistance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 9
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 11.7%; rating input score 12
- Program expense ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 3
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -261.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -128.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -136.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 11.7% of revenue deployed · 3.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.