Neighborhood House

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
410693916
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6517892500
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Neighborhood, Block Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,189,656
Expenses
$11,682,834
Assets
$21,270,518
Liabilities
$3,699,387

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

34 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANET GRACIA (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • SARAH BERGER (VP OF ADVANCEMENT): $114,410 total reported compensation
  • JANET GRACIA (PRESIDENT & CEO): $107,673 total reported compensation
  • MELANIE ACCOLA (VP OF FINANCE): $89,634 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Since 1897, when the women of mount zion temple created a safe haven for jewish refugees fleeing persecution in russia, neighborhood house has been a stronghold in the st. Paul community, helping all people in need. A welcoming presence for thousands of refugees, immigrants, and others in transition or crisis, neighborhood house is a full-service hub for those seeking assistance with basic needs from food to housing and helps people create future opportunities through education and programming for families, youth, and adults.neighborhood house has supported people from more than 50 different cultural backgrounds and nationalities over the decades, nimbly adapting to the changing needs of the individuals, families, and communities we serve. Our integrated approach to programming looks at various aspects of an individual's needs and well-being and serves every member of a family as they build strength and stability for the future. In fy25, neighborhood house served over 45,000 people.

What it reported doing in 2024

Youth & children: at neighborhood house, we believe in the power of education to lift each of us up so that we establish strong foundations to excel in the future. Our inclusive and culturally responsive educational programs for youth are built on this premise. Activities are designed to address the barriers immigrant and under-resourced families face in preparing their children for school. Youth and early childhood programming includes small steps child care, skills for school kindergarten readiness, youth literacy, summer sunrise camp, and out-of-school youth programs.youth programs: we provide a safe place for young people to develop skills, confidence, mentoring, and peer relationships through a variety of no-cost out of school and evening programs with supportive mentors.youth literacy program: for young people in grades k through 12 who need help with reading comprehension, fluency and writing skills. We know that each child learns differently, and our goal is to narrow the achievement gap for st. Paul and not let children fall through the cracks of the education system. 83% achieved a level gain in reading.summer sunrise: our youth summer camp brings young people together mondays through thursdays for seven weeks. This no-cost, fun program provides opportunities for youth in arts, sciences, sports and literacy enhancement to learn together. Nearly 73 youth made connections and explored new activities.skills for school: our program, for children 3-5 years old, helps students develop the skills they need to be ready for kindergarten. The curriculum focuses on math, vocabulary, and language skills to enhance social-emotional and academic development. More than 78% tested kindergarten-readythrive family visits: our child development specialist, a licensed teacher, offers extended learning and skill-building beyond the classroom and helps families navigate the school system.small steps child care: children ages 12 months through 5 years with a parent enrolled in an adult education class participate in this program to learn, play and practice english language skills. Community engagement: youth and families are best supported in an engaged community. Neighborhood house operates the paul & sheila wellstone center, the home of neighborhood house's main site by offering community and gathering space, hosting community events bringing youth, family and community together.internships: neighborhood house operates a paid internship program in partnership with twin city universities. The interns play an important part in providing additional support through a trauma informed approach. Volunteers: neighborhood house volunteers provide a critical resource in our ability to deliver programs through episodic, long-term and community-based volunteering. Neighborhood house volunteers are work in a variety of capacities in all of our programs, ranging from staffing our food markets, assisting in the pre-school and youth programs, just to name a few.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 58% for direct work, and 42% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.2%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 91.2%; rating input score 91; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.82; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.2% of revenue deployed · 74.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 28 of 28 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $8.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $114K · 34 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $365K reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.