Neighbor to Neighbor of South Carolina Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203314190
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8438390702
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,062,654
- Expenses
- $998,214
- Assets
- $299,978
- Liabilities
- $240,821
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
People named in this filing
- DAN HOPPE (CHAIR)
- KELLY O'BRIEN (VICE CHAIR)
- STEVE ATKINS (VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide access to the community for adults with disabilities, older adults and veterans through transportation, pantry delivery, and connectedness.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the year ended september 30, 2025, the organization relied on volunteer support to deliver transportation, pantry deliveries, and social connection services. For informational purposes only, and in accordance with gaap, the following volunteer service metrics are disclosed and are not recorded as revenue or expenses. The organization engaged 225 active volunteers who contributed 18,451 hours of service. Using the independent sector estimated value of volunteer time of $34.79 per hour, the estimated noncash value of volunteer services was $641,910; this amount is not reflected in the financial statements. Volunteers completed 8,763 transportation rides and 2,778 pantry deliveries, and 875 one-hour connection calls, and over 150,000 of passenger transportation miles. Through volunteer-supported programs, the organization served 788 individuals during the fiscal year. Services are delivered through a coordinated volunteer model supported by program staff who schedule services, ensure safety compliance, and monitor outcomes. This structure allows the organization to provide high service volume at a lower cost than market-rate transportation while maintaining reliability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 85% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.5%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $167.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.8; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.5% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $909K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.