Negrense Volunteers for Change Inc Foundation - USA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464203608
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
Location
Belmont, CA, USA
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$71,777
Expenses
$57,208
Assets
$19,784

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ben R Olivas (Chief Executive Officer)

People named in this filing

  • Ben R Olivas (Chief Executive Officer)
  • Thomas Harman (Secretary)
  • Clint Borrill (Chief Financial Officer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization provides vital financial support in the form of grants to Negrense Volunteers for Change NVC in the Philippines. NVC a tax-exempt entity under Philippine laws is dedicated to spearheading community development projects. These initiatives range from ensuring children have access to nutritious meals to bolstering educational programs and fostering sustainable livelihoods for local communities. By extending these grants our organization plays a pivotal role in empowering NVC to sustain and expand its transformative work ultimately creating positive impacts and improving the lives of individuals in need. The partnership with NVC exemplifies our commitment to supporting grassroots efforts that drive meaningful change and uplift underprivileged populations in the Philippines.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provision of Mingo meals to thousands of school children in the Central and Southern regions in the Philippines and support of other initiatives of NVC Philippines

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.6%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.3%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 101.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -21.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -26.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.6% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.