Needville Columbus Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611950625
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Needville, TX, USA
Phone
2817258780
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fraternal Societies

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,926
Expenses
$301,386
Assets
$276,826
Liabilities
$154,839

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mark Kovar (President)
  • Brian Graeber (Vice President)
  • Donald Zacek (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Mark Kovar (President)
  • Brian Graeber (Vice President)
  • Donald Zacek (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Needville Columbus Club was formed exclusively for the purpose of holding title to property with all of the income generated by the activities of the Needville Columbus Club being paid to its direct parent entity, Needville Knights of Columbus, Council No. 7067 for benevolent, charitable and educational undertakings. The primary activities of the Needville Columbus Club are to generate revenue from the rental of the social hall and pavilion for charitable, civic, religious and social events.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Needville Columbus Club was formed exclusively for the purpose of holding title to property with all of the income generated by the activities of the Needville Columbus Club being paid to its direct parent entity, Needville Knights of Columbus Club, Council No. 7067 for benevolent, charitable and educational undertakings. The primary activities of the Needville Columbus Club are to generate revenue from the rental of the social hall and pavilion for charitable, civic, religious and social events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -128.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.